Inter-individual variability to two modes of resistance training in the blood pressure dipping response in males
Date
Authors
Moncada Jiménez, José
Carpio Rivera, Elizabeth
Salicetti Fonseca, Alejandro
Solera Herrera, Andrea
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the inter-individual BP dipping variability of normotensive (NT) and hypertensive (HT) individuals completing two modalities of a single session of RTE. Methods: Volunteers were 41 males (NT n = 21, age = 19.7 ± 2.3 yr., weight = 72.5 ± 17.3 kg, height = 171.0 ± 5.0 cm, HT n = 22, age = 21.7 ± 4.6 yr., weight = 78.1 ± 11.0 kg, height = 174.0 ± 5.0 cm) who underwent a non-exercise control (CTRL), RTE low-repetitions high-sets (LRHS), and RTE high-repetitions low-sets (HRLS) conditions. The 24-h ambulatory monitoring recorded diurnal and nocturnal systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) BP. Factorial ANOVA compared SBP and DBP dipping responses in NT and HT individuals. Inter-individual responses were obtained by comparing diurnal and nocturnal BP differences. The technical error of measurement (TEM) and the smallest worthwhile change (SWC) were used to compute a BP threshold to identify responders and non-responders. Results: No significant group by measurement interaction was found on SBP (p = 0.301) and DBP (p = 0.574). Diurnal SBP was lower in the NT than in the HT groups (M = 117.4 ± 6.4 vs. 132.0 ± 8.2 mmHg, p ≤ 0.0001, η2 = 0.51). Diurnal DBP was lower in the NT than in the HT groups (M = 70.5 ± 6.2 vs. 77.7 ± 7.7 mmHg, p = 0.0001, η2 = 0.22). Nocturnal SBP was lower in the NT than in the HT groups (M = 106.6 ± 7.2 vs. 119.5 ± 8.3 mmHg, p ≤ 0.0001, η2 = 0.42). Nocturnal DBP was lower in the NT than in the HT groups (M = 60.4 ± 5.7 vs. 66.1 ± 8.2 mmHg, p = 0.014, η2 = 0.14). The dipping responders for SBP in the CTRL condition were 71.4% for NT and 70.0% for HT, in the HRLS condition were 66.7% for NT and 60.0% for HT, and in the LRHS condition were 57.1% for NT and 60.0% for HT. The dipping responders for DBP in the CTRL condition were 57.1% for NT and 60.0% for HT, in the HRLS condition were 61.9% for NT and 70.0% for HT, and in the LRHS condition were 71.4% for NT and 65.0% for HT. Conclusion: The inter-individual SBP dipping responders were similar between RTE modalities; however, for DBP, there were more HT responders than NT individuals completing a single session of HRLS RTE.
Description
Estudio de caso presentado en ACSM 2022
Keywords
resistance training, blood pressure, cardiovascular, exercise, hypertensive, hypertensive men, normotensive men