Show simple item record

dc.creatorArguedas Ramírez, Gabriela
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-08T17:15:19Z
dc.date.available2021-02-08T17:15:19Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10669/82765
dc.description.abstractI want to enrich the debate about the ethics and governance of human germline editing (HGE) by emphasizing an underappreciated, yet important, set of concerns regarding exclusionary practices, norms, and efforts that impede a broader discussion about the subject. The possibility for establishing a binding, global, regulatory framework is influenced by economic and geopolitical factors as well as historical processes and sociopolitical problems, such as anti-scientific social movements and the politicization of science. Likewise, it is influenced by different understanding, epistemic resources, and goals between the CRISPR/genome editing community and the rest of society. In this Perspective, I explain the concept of ‘‘techno-scientific colonialist paternalism’’ and why it negatively affects our discussion around HGE. I also discuss the pitfalls of scientific self-regulation, and finally, I advocate that the implementation of HGE should cease to allow time and care for a thoughtful global discussion to emerge.es_ES
dc.language.isoen_USes_ES
dc.sourceThe CRISPR Journal Volume 3, Number 2, 2020es_ES
dc.subjectBioéticaes_ES
dc.subjectGenomaes_ES
dc.subjectPolítica científicaes_ES
dc.subjectTecnología médicaes_ES
dc.subjectInvestigación genéticaes_ES
dc.titleEthics and Global Governance of Human Germline Genome Editing: The Problem of Techno-Scientific Colonialist Paternalismes_ES
dc.typeartículo científico
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/crispr.2019.0045
dc.description.procedenceUCR::Vicerrectoría de Investigación::Unidades de Investigación::Ciencias Sociales::Centro de Investigación en Estudios de La Mujer (CIEM)es_ES


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record