Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.creatorMileto, Achille
dc.creatorMarin, Daniele
dc.creatorAlfaro Córdoba, Marcela
dc.creatorRamirez Giraldo, Juan Carlos
dc.creatorEusemann, Christian D.
dc.creatorScribano, Emanuele
dc.creatorBlandino, Alfredo
dc.creatorMazziotti, Silvio
dc.creatorAscenti, Giorgio
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-11T19:18:14Z
dc.date.available2018-06-11T19:18:14Z
dc.date.issued2014-08
dc.identifier.citationhttps://pubs.rsna.org/doi/10.1148/radiol.14140171
dc.identifier.issn0033-8419
dc.identifier.issn1527-1315
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10669/74886
dc.description.abstractPurpose: to investigate whether dual-energy multidetector row computed tomographic (CT) imaging with iodine quantification is able to distinguish between clear cell and papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) subtypes. Materials and Methods: in this retrospective, HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board–approved study, 88 patients (57 men, 31 women) with diagnosis of either clear cell or papillary RCC at pathologic analysis, who underwent contrast material–enhanced dual-energy nephrographic phase study between December 2007 and June 2013, were included. Five readers, blinded to pathologic diagnosis, independently evaluated all cases by determining the lesion iodine concentration on color-coded iodine maps. The receiving operating characteristic curve analysis was adopted to estimate the optimal threshold for discriminating between clear cell and papillary RCC, and results were validated by using a leave-one-out cross-validation. Interobserver agreement was assessed by using an intraclass correlation coefficient. The correlation between tumor iodine concentration and tumor grade was investigated. Results: a tumor iodine concentration of 0.9 mg/mL represented the optimal threshold to discriminate between clear cell and papillary RCC, and it yielded the following: sensitivity, 98.2% (987 of 1005 [95% confidence interval: 97.7%, 98.7%]); specificity, 86.3% (272 of 315 [95% confidence interval: 85.0%, 87.7%]); positive predictive value, 95.8% (987 of 1030 [95% confidence interval: 95.0%, 96.6%]); negative predictive value, 93.7% (272 of 290 [95% confidence interval: 92.8%, 94.7%]); overall accuracy of 95.3% (1259 of 1320 [95% confidence interval: 94.6%, 96.2%]), with an area under the curve of 0.923 (95% confidence interval: 0.913, 0.933). An excellent agreement was found among the five readers in measured tumor iodine concentration (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.9990 [95% confidence interval: 0. 9987, 0.9993). A significant correlation was found between tumor iodine concentration and tumor grade for both clear cell (τ = 0.85; P < .001) and papillary RCC (τ = 0.53; P < .001). Conclusion: dual-energy multidetector CT with iodine quantification can be used to distinguish between clear cell and papillary RCC, and it provides insights regarding the tumor grade.es_ES
dc.language.isoen_USes_ES
dc.relation.ispartofRadiology Volumen 273 Número 3
dc.sourceRadiology, Vol 273(3), p.813-820es_ES
dc.subjectRenal masses_ES
dc.subjectDual energy CTes_ES
dc.subjectRenal cell carcinomaes_ES
dc.subjectSurgeryes_ES
dc.subjectPartial nephrectomyes_ES
dc.subjectTotal nephrectomyes_ES
dc.subjectPathologyes_ES
dc.subjectClear cell renal cell carcinomaes_ES
dc.subjectPapillary renal cell carcinomaes_ES
dc.subject616.075 72 Iodine quantification to distinguish clear cell from papillary renal cell carcinoma at dual-energy multidetector CT: a multireader diagnostic performance studyes_ES
dc.titleIodine Quantification to Distinguish Clear Cell from Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma at Dual-Energy Multidetector CT: A Multireader Diagnostic Performance Studyes_ES
dc.typeartículo original
dc.date.updated2018-05-14T20:27:21Z
dc.identifier.doi10.1148/radiol.14140171
dc.description.procedenceUCR::Vicerrectoría de Docencia::Ciencias Sociales::Facultad de Ciencias Económicas::Escuela de Estadísticaes_ES
dc.identifier.pmid25162309


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem