Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorAragón Vargas, Luis Fernando
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-20T19:51:52Z
dc.date.available2015-04-20T19:51:52Z
dc.date.issued2000
dc.identifier.citationhttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/S15327841MPEE0404_2#.VRXEyfmG_Cses_ES
dc.identifier.issnessn:1532-7841
dc.identifier.issnissn:1091-367X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10669/11391
dc.descriptionartículo (postprint) -- Universidad de Costa Rica, Escuela de Educación Física y Deportes. 2000es_ES
dc.description.abstractVertical jump performance tests can give considerably different results, even when different methods are used to analyze a single jump trial. To evaluate and compare four different methods commonly used to measure vertical jump performance, 52 physically active males each performed five maximal vertical jumps. Kinetic and kinematic data were used to analyze each trial using the four methods: a criterion test based on body center of mass displacement (VJPT); two methods based on vertical take-off velocity as calculated form the force platform (JUMP2 and JUMP3); and one method based on time in the air (JUMPAIR). All four methods showed excellent reliability (R>0.97). Using VJPT as the criterion, the other three methods showed excellent coefficients of validity (R>0.95) but poor accuracy: the vertical jump results were statistically different among all methods (p<0.01). From the discussion, JUMPAIR is considered a relatively simple and inexpensive method to obtain valid and reliable measures of vertical jump performance without an arm swing, provided the appropriate adjustments are made to the jump results.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/Universidad de Costa Rica/Escuela de Educación Física y Deportes//Costa Rica//es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/University of Michigan/Rackham Dissertation Grant//United States//es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/Universidad de Costa Rica//VI-245-95-276/Costa Rica//es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/University of Michigan/Rackham Predoctoral Fellowship//United States//es_ES
dc.language.isoen_USes_ES
dc.relation.hasversionhttp://kerwa.ucr.ac.cr/handle/10669/29494
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0 Costa Rica*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/cr/*
dc.sourceMeasurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science 4(4):215-228es_ES
dc.subjectVertical jumpes_ES
dc.subjectSalto verticales_ES
dc.subjectSports biomechanicses_ES
dc.subjectBiomecánica deportivaes_ES
dc.subjectDeportees_ES
dc.titleEvaluation of four vertical jump tests: methodology, reliability, validity, and accuracy (postprint)es_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersiones_ES
dc.typeArtículo científicoes_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1207/S15327841MPEE0404_2
dc.description.procedenceUCR::Docencia::Ciencias Sociales::Facultad de Educación::Escuela de Educación Físicaes_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0 Costa Rica
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0 Costa Rica